Cheap Ge 2037082-001 Li-ion Laptop battery, Brand New 2037082-001 replacement battery for GE MAC800 MAC 800 Series ECG EKG Monitor

4500mAh/33Wh 7.2V Ge 2037082-001 Batteries for GE MAC800 MAC 800 Series ECG EKG Monitor, Ge 2037082-001 Laptop battery is a brand new,100% Compatible original and replacement Laptop battery,Purchase wholesale and retail 2037082-001 with high quality and low price!

2037082-001 Battery ge Li-ion 7.2V 4500mAh/33Wh

2037082-001

Specifications

  • Brand:GE
  • Capacity :4500mAh/33Wh
  • Voltage :7.2V
  • Type :Li-ion
  • Battery Cell Quality: Grade A
  • Descriptive: Replacement Battery – 1 Year Warranty
  • Description: Brand New, 1 Year Warranty! 30-Days Money Back! Fast Shipping!

How we test this Ge 2037082-001 Battery Li-ion 7.2V 4500mAh/33Wh

Step 1: Make sure customer bought the correct battery.
Step 2: Check battery’s appearance and interface.
Step 3: Test battery charger and recharger function.
Step 4: Charger the battery to 100% and recharger to 0% to get real battery capacity
Step 5: Use Ev2300 to check the voltage difference of each goroup cells.
Step 6: Charger battery power more than 30%.
Step 7: Package battery carefully and send out

Compatible Part Numbers:

2037082-001

Compatible Model Numbers:

GE MAC800 MAC 800 Series ECG EKG Monitor

Battery Weight:246g

How much do you know about how to run laptop well as any place? The follow Tips cut way back on protecting battery life.


1). Please recharge or change your Laptop battery when battery power low.
2). Using Li-Ion Replacement Ge 2037082-001 Laptop Battery for your notebook which can work longer time than Non Li-ion one.
3). It is better to defragmentation regularly for your Laptop battery life.
4). In order to reduce the laptop power consumpition, you can use some optical drive spin-down and hard drive in your Laptop .
5). Please keep your laptop in sleep or standby model without long time using, which both save the Replacement Ge 2037082-001 Laptop Battery power and extend battery using life.
6). Leave your battery in a dry and cool condition when without using.
7). When you rarely or generally plugged in fixed power using, Please take down your battery to avoid hurting battery life.

Hot Products

11.1V/12.4v 2300mah BOSE 404600 for Bose SOUNDLINK I II III7.4V 2230mAH/17Wh BOSE 063404 for BOSE SOUNDLINK Mini I Series3.8 V 1300 mAh AMAZON MC-305070 for AMAZON Kindle Voyage3.8V 2930mAh/11.1Wh NETGEAR W-7 for Netgear AirCard 790S 790SP 8103.85V/4.4V 3080MAH/11.86WH ALCATEL TLp030JC for Alcatel A3 XL 9008j7.7V 37Wh/4810mAh ACER AP16M5J for ACER A315-51-51SL N17Q1 SERIES3.8V 4000mAh/15.2Wh LENOVO L15D1P31 for Lenovo Yoga Tab3 Pro YT3-X90L11.4V 84Wh DELL 4GVGH for DELL XPS 15 9550 4GVGH 1P6KD7.68V 38Wh/4955mAh LENOVO BSNO4170A5-AT for Lenovo 5B10L68713 5B10L67278 L3.8V/4.35V 2580MAH/9.8Wh ALCATEL TLp025G2 for ALCATEL OT- 9001A OT- 9001X OT

GOOGLE MAKES THE RIGHT CHOICE FOR FINAL VIRTUAL DESKS GESTURE NAVIGATION

In most functional ways, Google’s Virtual Desks for Chrome OS fully arrived in the latest version: Chrome OS 78. With all the animations, features and new set of keyboard shortcuts now available to users right out of the box, Virtual Desks feels nearly complete. We talked briefly about the last, lingering piece that was missing in gesture navigation with Chrome OS 78 and that was the inability for users to move between active Virtual Desks with a gesture on the trackpad.

When turning on the single flag needed to enable this feature, the choice of gestures is a tad bit questionable. Again, as we’ve talked about in the past, there are many folks who’ve been using Chrome OS for a very long time and certain multi-finger moves on the trackpad surface are inexorably tied to certain things in our minds now. The biggest one for me is the 3-finger swipe left and right to scrub through tabs.

For me, this is one of those tiny gestures that sets using a Chromebook apart from other devices. If you’ve not tried it, you most definitely should get it into your normal workflow. With a quick 3-finger slide left or right on the trackpad, you can seamlessly move between your open tabs in the browser and it is easily my favorite productivity gesture on a Chromebook that you can’t leverage on any other operating system.

Here’s the issue. With the addition of Virtual Desks, Google chose to take that 3-finger gesture and apply it to Virtual Desk navigation instead. So, when you turn on the flag for Virtual Desk gesture navigation right now, your 3-finger swipe will no longer move you through open tabs in your browser. Instead, this behavior has been mapped to a 4-finger swipe left or right and my brain has not been able to handle it. 

I’m not kidding: I’ve had Virtual Desks turned on in every way, shape and form since they were introduced and ever since they changed around the 3/4-finger gestures, I’ve been trying to retrain my brain with absolutely no success. As a matter of fact, right before this paragraph started, I was going to swipe over to my Gmail tab and check something and instead went to my adjacent Virtual Desk. It’s starting to get aggravating.

Thankfully, we’ve spotted a bug report entry that shows clearly that Google is planning on implementing Virtual Desk gestures in a way that keeps the beloved 3-finger gesture mapped to tab scrubbing. I and many other users can breath a bit easier knowing that one of the best navigation moves in the OS is here to stay. No need to retrain my brain. No need to force myself to forget years of habit. Check it out below:

Desks: Prepare Virtual Desks Gestures for launch

This CL makes the following changes:

– Tab scrubbing will always use 3-finger gestures.

– 4-finger horizontal swipes will switch desks only if

the flag “–enable-virtual-desks-gestures” is enabled.

– 3-finger horizontal swipes while in Overview will always

move the highlighter.

This CL is meant to be merged back to M-79.

A follow-up CL will remove the “–enable-virtual-desks-gestures”

flag entirely on M-80, so that virtual desks gestures will always

be enabled going forward.

Instead, moving between Virtual Desks will happen with a 4-finger left/right gesture. I know other operating systems use a 3-finger gesture, but I genuinely feel like Google is making the right call, here. After all, mapping the more-complex navigation (moving entire desks) to the more-complex gesture makes way more logical sense. And, as much as I love Virtual Desks, the more useful navigation is really tab scrubbing in Chrome OS, so I’m extremely excited to see it will continue forward as it always has: untouched and unmatched.

Dual AMD Epyc Rome 7H12 Server CPUs Benchmarked in Cray Supercomputer

A Geekbench 4 submission today shows off the power of two AMD EPYC Rome 7H12 64-core, 128-thread server-grade processors in one Cray Shasta supercomputer. AMD added the 7H12 to its second-gen EPYC line in September.

AMD currently has three 64-core, 128-thread EPYC chips in its arsenal; although, more might be on the way. With a 2.6 GHz base clock and 3.3 GHz boost clock, the EPYC 7H12 is the fastest performer out of the three existing models. The chip is rated rated for 280W, which is 55W higher than the EPYC 7742, so the 7H12 should have a higher all-core turbo clock.

The Shasta was rocking two EPYC 7H12 processors, meaning it had 128 cores and 256 threads at its disposal. The system put up a single-core score of 4,512 points and a multi-core score of 181,580 points.

Surprisingly, Shasta’s configuration wasn’t enough to put the supercomputer in first place on the Geekbench 4 rankings. The current Geekbench 4 multi-core record belongs to a Gigabyte R282-Z92 system, which sports a pair of EPYC 7742 chips. Shasta lags behind the R282-Z92 by roughly 3.4% and 7.6% in the single-and multi-core scores, respectively.

On paper, the EPYC 7H12 should outperform the EPYC 7742. Due to the lack of detailed information, we can only assume that the discrepancy is attributed to the fact that both systems were running different memory, operating systems and versions of the Geekbench 4 software.

This RGB memory kit runs faster in certain Gigabyte Aorus motherboards

Gigabyte has added an interesting feature to its newest Aorus RGB memory kit, one that allows it to run faster in certain motherboards with minimal fuss. It’s called “Aorus Boost,” and it gives users up to a 4 percent bump in performance.

Even without the boost feature, Gigabyte’s new 16GB (2x8GB) DDR4-3600 memory kit is the fastest one it has released so far. At 3600MHz, the timings are configured at 18-19-19-39, according to the RAM’s main product page and Gigabyte’s press release. (Curiously, the specifications section lists slightly higher timings—19-19-19-43 on Intel platforms and 20-19-19-43 on Ryzen configs, so go figure.)

It’s the boost feature that is somewhat interesting, though.

“Many users often look to overclock their RAM and tweak their timings for higher memory frequencies and better performance. Memory overclocking can be a hit or miss though with users often spending lots of time trying to unlock better memory performance to little effect as their overclocked memory performance falls short of their expectations,” Gigabyte explains.

This is where Aorus Boost comes into play. On certain Aorus X570 and Z390 motherboards, there is an Aorus Memory Boost setting in the BIOS that will apply the necessary settings to increase the frequency up to 3733MHz. Compatible motherboards include the following models:

Z390 Aorus Xtreme Waterforce 5G

Z390 Aorus Xtreme Waterforce

Z390 Aorus Xtreme

Z390 Aorus Master

Z390 Aorus Ultra

Z390 Aorus Pro WiFi

X570 Aorus Xtreme

X570 Aorus Master

X570 Aorus Ultra

X570 Aorus Pro WiFi

X570 Aorus Pro

X570 I Aorus Pro WiFi

It’s not clear what effect this has on timings; I presume they get loosened a touch. Outside of the boost feature, Gigabyte says this kit is built on a “10-layer, sophisticated PCG that ensures the stability and performance” of the memory chips, which are “100 percent sorted and tested.” Binning is a common practice on the best RAM kits, though, so this is not unique to Gigabyte.

There are two versions of this kit available. Both sport a pair of 8GB modules, but the second version also includes a couple of “demo modules.” These are dummy modules for people who want to fill all their DIMM slots with RGB lighting, without buying more RAM.

Gigabyte did not say when this RAM will be available or how much the two versions will cost. As a point of reference, Gigabyte’s Aorus RGB 16GB DDR4-3200 memory kit with demo modules sell for $169.99 on Amazon.

That said, if you are in the market for RAM (or pretty much anything else), it might be worth waiting a week to see what of Black Friday deals emerge.

Chinese SSD Manufacturer Races Forward to PCIe 5.0

According to a report by Chinese media IThome, Jiangsu Huacun Electronic Technology has demoed its PCIe 5.0 controller at the 2019 Nantong New Generation Information Technology Expo. The memory and storage manufacturer is optimistic that the controller will be in mass-production by the end of 2020.

It was only this year that computer hardware started to arrive with support for the PCIe 4.0 standard. Presently, PCIe 4.0 is still limited to AMD’s current Ryzen desktop CPUs, Ryzen Threadripper HEDT (high-end desktop) CPU line and Epyc server processor portfolio. Intel has yet to board the PCIe 4.0 train, but is expected to do so soon.

Little is known about the HC9001 PCIe 5.0 controller. It’s reportedly produced with the 12nm manufacturing process by the China National Research Institute and Jiangsu Huacun Electronic Technology. The HC9001, which is China’s first domestic PCIe 5.0 controller, is gaining a lot of buzz, so perhaps we’ll get more information as time progresses.

The PCIe 5.0 standard promises to deliver a throughput up to 128 GBps over a x16 slot. This is double the bandwidth of what the PCIe 4.0 interface can do. At this point, PCIe 5.0 would be overkill for the average consumer, considering that today’s mainstream graphics cards and SSDs aren’t fast enough to use PCIe 4.0 to its max potential. However, PCIe 5.0 will certainly be a welcomed progression in the cloud computing, big data, AI and 5G industries.

An unconfirmed Intel roadmap shows the chipmaker adopting the PCIe 5.0 standard with its forthcoming Sapphire Rapids enterprise-grade processors in 2021. So far, we haven’t heard anything about PCIe 5.0 on the AMD front.

WhatsApp Update Drains OnePlus Batteries

OnePlus users beware: WhatsApp will (probably) drain your battery.

According to posts on Reddit and the OnePlus official forums, the latest version of WhatsApp (v.2.19.308, which dropped at the end of last month) is seriously eating into the battery life of a whole range of OnePlus phones, including the OnePlus 7T series that only arrived in October. The issue is affecting devices running either Android 9 or 10 and those hit by it are seeing up to 50 per cent of their battery life being consumed by WhatsApp, even overnight.

Users have found various workarounds for fixing something the developers should really have caught before releasing the app into the wild, including force-stopping WhatsApp when it’s not being used. This admittedly defeats the purpose of the always-on messaging app WhatsApp is supposed to be, but at least stops it from killing your battery overnight.

The problem seems to have been fixed in the latest version of WhatsApp (v.2.19.325), which hasn’t yet hit the Google Play Store, but you can download it direct from WhatsApp if you’re one of those affected. 

Microsoft Edge is coming to Linux. But will anybody use it?

At Microsoft Ignite last week, a slide announced that Microsoft’s project to rebase its perennially unloved Edge browser on Google’s open source project Chromium is well underway. Release candidates for the new Chromium-based Edge build are available on consumer and server versions of Windows (including Windows 7 and Server 2008, which have already left mainstream support), as well as MacOS, Android, and iOS.

Sharper-eyed attendees also noticed a promise for future Linux support.

Curious folks can download canary or beta versions of the new Edge for most operating systems from Microsoft Edge Insider—although there’s nothing there yet for Linux. Browsing the Edge Insider site from Chrome on Linux replaces the download button with “Not supported for Linux.” Using Firefox instead presents you with a download button for the Windows 10 version, presumably due to that browser’s newly enhanced privacy controls.

We downloaded the Edge beta on a Windows Server 2012 R2 VM and took it for a quick spin. So far, it looks very much like Chrome itself—enough so that you might not notice which browser you’re using unless you look very specifically.

For the moment, it doesn’t look like there’s much to get excited about in Edge’s new Chromium flavor—it’s pretty much just Chromium with one additional button that lets you go to your Favorites and another smiley-face button that sends feedback to developers. Browsing to chrome://extensions redirects you to edge://extensions and presents you with an offer to head to the Microsoft Store to find some. The profile button, similarly, takes you to a Microsoft login page rather than a Google one.

It seems unlikely that the Linux world is going to go ga-ga for what seems to essentially be a reskinning of Chromium—but that might be missing Microsoft’s real thrust here. Many developers—including Linux developers—choose Azure over rival cloud services like Amazon Web Services or Google Cloud, and bringing Edge to Linux may represent little more than a way to offer those developers deeper ties into Microsoft’s profile and identity management services.

If a developer already has and uses Azure authentication for work, the ability to tie that authentication directly to the browser itself may be just enough to make Edge interesting.

Intel NUC 10 appears with 10th Gen Comet Lake-U CPUs

The Intel NUC 10 has started appearing at online retailers, and seemingly this is the “Frost Canyon” NUC that has been rumored as the next NUC release.

Intel’s newest NUC is seemingly the rumored “Frost Canyon” and might look the same as it’s the predecessor

Not all the details pertaining to the newest NUC is available at this time, but it does look like this NUC will be in a similar (or the same) 4 x 4 enclosure. From a tip per the leaker @momomo_US, the upcoming Frost Canyon NUCs will be powered by Intel Comet Lake-U CPUs.

Intel’s Frost Canyon NUC Configurations:

There are seemingly three different versions of this NUC, each being centered around a different processor.

i7-10710U This processor is a very high-end laptop processor that has a total of 6 cores (2 logical threads per physical core).

This processor has a clock speed of 1.1 GHz, not very fast but the TDP under a normal operation if 15 watts. The boost clock of the processor is an amazing 4.7 GHz which makes sense when looking at the max TDP 25 watts.

The score for the CPU benchmark is 12985 pts.

i5-10210U This processor is the more mid-range processor which has a total of 4 cores (2 logical threads per physical core).

The clock speed of 1.6 GHz is the base clock of this processor which is quite a bit faster than the i7 variant but has a slower max clock speed of 4.2 GHz.

The score for this processor is 8814 pts.

i3-10110U i3 has a base clock speed of 2.10 GHz, which is significantly faster i5. The boost clock of the i3 is a 4.1 GHz which is only 0.1 GHz slower than the i5’s boost clock.

The i3 only has 2 cores (2 logical threads per physical core) which make this processor noticeably the lower-end model.

The score from CPUBenchmark is 5930 pts.

The Intel NUC 10 is most definitely not aimed at the gaming community, seeing as there is no discrete graphics card of any type, and as such the integrated graphics unit runs all the connected displays. This means that (since the CPU is a comet-lake generation) means that the integrated graphics is Intel’s UHD graphics 620 solutions. The NUCs are currently available for pre-order on BLT’s website, with no information on when the items will actually be available.

The 16-inch MacBook Pro reportedly still in production with release date unknown

Apple may not have launched the 16-inch MacBook Pro in October when some projections had expected it to show up. But, with that timeline passed, 2020 is looking more likely, and it may currently be in production according to IDC Analyst Jitesh Ubrani, Forbes reports.

Explaining the signs that the 16-inch MacBook Pro was still coming, Ubrani said, “We’re also starting to see early signs of this from the supply chain. However, the timing of this is still uncertain.”

This would suggest that a November launch date of this year may also be too soon to hope for. Forbes also reported that a source in Asia said production was indeed underway.

While all this adds uncertainty to a launch timeline for the 16-inch MacBook Pro, it does still appear likely the product is coming. A file within macOS Catalina 10.15.1 showed hints of an updated design, something both the 13- and 15-inch MacBook Pro models released in 2019 lacked.

Cause for delay

One previously speculated reason given for why the 16-inch MacBook Pro could be delayed was keyboard issues. These have plagued recent MacBook computers thanks to the issue-prone butterfly key switch mechanisms used to offer lower-profile keys. Even the newest MacBook Pro models retain the Butterfly keyboards, but there have been rumors that Apple would move back to a standard scissor switch moving forward.

The transition away from one key switch technology to another could easily be a reason for a delay.

Then there are other aspects expected that could further the delay. A redesigned Touch Bar could be contributing to hitch in production, as could the new, bigger display.

Another factor that could be in play but out of Apple’s hands is CPU availability. If Apple plans to go with Intel’s powerful Comet Lake processors, supply may stand in the way. Intel has struggled recently with producing enough of its 14nm processors, and that CPU shortage may last into 2020. If Apple doesn’t have the processors to put into its MacBook Pro models, it will just have to wait. And, switching over to an AMD Zen 2 processor doesn’t seem like a likely option, especially since mobile versions have yet to launch.

Related product: Apple MacBook Pro 13″ (2015)

Our Verdict:

☆☆☆☆☆

The 2014 13-inch MacBook Pro was arguably Apple’s best laptop, and the 2015 model is better still. If your next MacBook needs to be reliable, powerful and practical, the newest MacBook Pro is the only way to go.

FOR Retina Display

Faster processor

Superb battery life

AGAINST Force Touch underdeveloped

Unchanged design

Base storage feels small

Dell XPS 13 2-in-1 review: the XPS 13 to get

Dell’sDell’s XPS line of laptops has long trended toward the conservative side. The XPS 13 and 15 models have had the same basic design for years, with only minor feature changes between generations. Neither of them are particularly exciting — they are pragmatic workhorses designed to be as functional as possible, while maintaining their compact and portable dimensions.

The XPS 13 2-in-1, however, has been a bit more daring. The first model, released nearly three years ago, took the XPS design language and added a 360-degree hinge for flipping between a standard clamshell laptop and a tablet. It went all-in on USB-C, ditching the traditional USB-A ports still available on the standard XPS 13 at the time, and relied on a slower, fanless processor. The result was a computer that was more limited than the standard XPS 13, despite its higher price tag.

So Dell has now released a completely revised version of the XPS 13 2-in-1, with a more powerful (not fanless) processor, new keyboard and trackpad, improved display, and overall better design than the original. The $999.99-and-up ($1,749.99, as tested) XPS 13 2-in-1 is perhaps the most interesting — and compelling — XPS 13 laptop I’ve used in years. But there are still a few things that might prompt you to stick with the standard version.

The new XPS 13 2-in-1 still looks like an XPS 13, with a sturdy, all-metal build and compact dimensions. But Dell has tweaked three significant things that make this model more pleasant to use than its predecessor or even the standard XPS 13.

The first is a new, 16:10 13.4-inch display. Every XPS 13 before this model has used a 16:9 screen, which looks great when you’re watching full-screen video, but feels horribly cramped when working in documents or browsing the internet. The new screen matches the aspect ratio of a MacBook and is a much more comfortable computer to work on. It’s not quite as good as the 3:2 screens you’ll find in a Surface Laptop 3, but it’s noticeably better than the standard XPS 13. Even with the new aspect ratio, the screen still has the tiny bezels that have become a signature XPS 13 feature, and the top bezel is home to the laptop’s webcam. The taller screen has also eliminated the area where Dell would stamp its logo in the bottom bezel, which I’m sure zero people will miss.

Dell offers the 2-in-1 with either a 4K panel or a 1920 x 1200 pixel screen, with my test unit having the latter. I don’t think 4K resolution is necessary at this screen size, as the lower-res screen costs $300 less, is less taxing on the processor, and is still plenty sharp at normal working distances. Either screen gets brighter than average (over 500 nits) and covers 100 percent of the sRGB color gamut, though the 4K panel supports Dolby Vision and is HDR 400 rated. I didn’t miss it though and if I were buying this computer, I’d choose the lower-resolution screen without thinking twice about it.

One issue I did encounter with the 2-in-1’s display was a slow touch response, especially if I hadn’t used the touchscreen in some time. It would sometimes take a few taps to register my inputs, almost as if the touch controller had gone to sleep and needed to be woken up before it would react. That’s normally not a huge problem on a laptop, where you mostly use the keyboard and trackpad for input, but it’s less than ideal for a computer that’s also supposed to pull double duty as a tablet.

The second change is a newly designed, double action hinge, which sets the screen slightly lower than the keyboard half when it’s opened to a standard laptop position. It’s not hugely different from the hinges Lenovo has used on its Yoga laptops for years. This keeps the overall height of the 2-in-1 lower than a traditional 360-degree hinge, even with the taller aspect ratio, and makes it easy to fit the computer on an airplane tray table, preserving one of the best features of the XPS 13 line. The hinge is stiff, so the screen doesn’t wobble, but is still easy to open with one finger.

The third change is an all-new, low-profile keyboard that stretches all the way to the left and right of the computer’s lower half. The keys are larger and more comfortable to type on than the standard XPS 13, and they make more efficient use of the XPS’s compact keyboard deck. Dell says this keyboard design is 24 percent thinner than a standard keyboard. There’s also a fingerprint scanner built into the power button just above the backspace key.

But this keyboard, much like the low-profile butterfly keyboards on MacBooks, will be polarizing. I find it to be very comfortable to type on and don’t mind the low travel or loud noise compared to other laptops. (I also don’t mind typing on the MacBook keyboard either, at least when it’s not broken.) Not everyone will feel the same way, however, and I do not know if this keyboard will suffer from similar reliability problems as Apple’s. It hasn’t in the month-plus I’ve been testing the machine, at least.

Another bonus in the 2-in-1 is a 19 percent larger trackpad, which is made of glass and uses Microsoft’s Windows Precision drivers. It’s smoother to scroll on and nicer to click than the standard XPS 13’s trackpad and has excellent palm rejection. My only gripe is it occasionally registers a left click as a right click, but this is a common complaint I have with many Windows trackpads.

Inside, the new 10th-gen Intel processor is just as impressive here as it was in the Surface Laptop 3 13.5 I recently reviewed. The Core i7-1065G7 quad-core chip in my review unit is snappy and responsive for any productivity tasks I need to get done, and its integrated graphics are even powerful enough to handle 4K video editing in a pinch. I wouldn’t consider using the XPS 13 2-in-1 for gaming, but it’s more than powerful enough for the tasks expected from a thin-and-light laptop.

If you do want to expand its capabilities there are two Thunderbolt 3 USB-C ports, which you can plug an external GPU, a display, or a fast external storage device into. They are, unfortunately, the only ports (aside from a 3.5mm headphone jack) on the computer, but even the standard XPS 13 has ditched the traditional USB-A ports at this point. Two years ago, a USB-C only computer was still a pain, but at this point it’s much easier to live with. Dell does include a USB-C to A adapter in the box, at least. There’s also a microSD card slot on the left side, which is nice to have, even if it never gets used.

Other hardware niceties include decent-sounding speakers, an LED light strip on the lower lip that tells you the status of the battery as it’s being charged, and far-field microphones that can pick up your voice from up to 14 feet away.

Unsurprisingly, the XPS 13 2-in-1 isn’t very comfortable to use as a tablet, with its 2.9-pound curb weight and 13mm thick chassis. It works fine for watching video in “tent mode”, but like every other 2-in-1 convertible it won’t be replacing your iPad anytime soon.

Also on the disappointing side is the 2-in-1’s battery life. I’ve been getting just over six hours of use between charges when using the laptop for work, bouncing between Slack, Word, multiple browser windows, and a handful of virtual desktops, with the screen set to 50 percent brightness. You can probably eke out some more life by lowering the screen brightness — thanks to the 2-in-1’s high peak brightness, 30 or 40 percent is comfortable to use indoors — so I don’t think it completely ruins the experience, but I’d always like to see more battery life.

Overall, the XPS 13 2-in-1 is the computer I’ve been wanting Dell to make — more daring and interesting than the staid standard model, but still maintaining the qualities that have made the XPS 13 a perennial contender. The 2-in-1 makes no compromises when it comes to performance, is just as compact and portable as the standard XPS 13, and has a more usable display. If the low-profile keyboard doesn’t stop you in your tracks, the XPS 13 2-in-1 is the best XPS 13 to buy this year, and perhaps one of the best 13-inch laptops you can buy, full stop.